some observations on the war on terror and other contemporary farces.
http://deadlinelive.info/2010/07/26/wikileaks-911-and-george-soros/ check this out , george. are you going to be attending Chelsea"s wedding?
and here's the motherlode: http://arthurzbygniew.blogspot.com/2010/03/soros-co-back-wikileaks-kosher-mob-oval.html
and try this one on for size too!"http://www.youtube.com/v/h89KIsZaRV8&hl=en_US&fs=1"off air, King promises Clinton the world "when he get's elected". you've probably seen this already, if so, maybe your readers will find it interesting. a rare glimpse into the backroom of political subterfuge.
the king video with clinton is definitely a classic. ive given the other theories some thought, but the problem i have with them is that I fail to see how wikileaks is helping the interests of the CIA in their actions. They are actually rallying criticism of the war internationally with their releases. do you really believe that Gates and Mullen are "faking" their admonishing of wikileaks? while anything is possible these days, im sticking with the idea that these guys are doing good work until there is some powerful evidence to the contrary. being partnered with an organization which recieved soros funding is hardly evidence of being a CIA front operation. i also believe that it usually is the case when an anti establishment group gets in the limelight, it sometimes leads to infighting. in classic COINTELPRO that is encouraged and created. initially you were impressed by the wikileaks releases, now you are more skeptical it sounds.
btw i won't make chelsea's wedding. i am choosing instead to watch American Idol at home instead that night.