Sunday, September 12, 2010

Third Light At Ground Zero

Most people probably know that there is a tribute to 9/11 in the form of two giant beams of light which are projected up into the clouds over Lower Manhattan. As part of events organized by Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth and We Are Change of New York a third beam was sent up into the sky last night to represent Building 7, the often ignored third building, 47 stories high, which collapsed in seven seconds to the ground on 9/11, later in the afternoon of that fateful day. It was never hit by a plane. Two planes, three buildings, figure that one out. It had an office fire in it but nothing that could have brought it down that quickly. It housed New York branches of the Secret Service, the CIA, and the SEC among others. Videos of the collapse look exactly like a controlled demolition. Planting explosives takes days so whoever brought down 7 was well aware of what was going to happen that day.

Two lights:

And then suddenly three:

I was glad to be present at the event where many notables of the truth movement were such as Luke Rudkowski and Richard Gage. Despite calls to the media, I have yet to see any mainstream news program cover the third light that shined for hours in downtown manhattan.

I did encounter several people who were ex-military at the event. Though they made no public presentation they confirmed that they thought 9/11 was an inside job. One said he knew right away that something wasn't right about 9/11 since he knew how much surveillance the military actually does. He knew that an operation like 9/11 would be impossible without inside help. Another said that in the months before 9/11 there was an obvious build up in their training that made everybody think they were to be deployed soon.


  1. To the the author of /of goats and men/:
    When you say
    "nothing that could have brought it down that quickly"
    you show that you do not approach the unknown, from a scientific point of view, but rather a biased one with unfounded preconceived notions.

    Here are some creditable sources that disagree with your assessment of WT #7:

  2. thanks for the comment. sorry but for me that fall was just too perfect. the video of the fall itself is on none of you "debunking" websites because frankly it is just too obviously a controlled demolition. Steel skyscrapers can have giant infernos in them without collapsing. if that weren't true i think the rules of building demolition would change completely. the reason building demolition is such a craft and an art is because it simply isn't that easy to bring down a steel building and not in seven seconds and in it's own footprint.

    I did find this interesting from the popular mechanics website:

    'the smallest charge capable of initiating column failure "would have resulted in a sound level of 130 dB [decibels] to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile." Witnesses did not report hearing such a loud noise, nor is one audible on recordings of the collapse.'

    I just spoke with someone recently whose family member was at the site of WTC 7 and claims to suffer severe hearing problems to this day from the explosions.

    I know it's hard to accept that the "powers that be" could be so decieitful. but remember starting wars is big business and we lost 50,000 people in vietnam because certain people wanted that war. it also started with someone supposedly attacking us. the gulf of tonkin incident is admitted by most today to have also been a deception.

    do you also deny the fraud on wall street? the fraud which is bringing down our economic system? do you deny the fraud of big pharma? or the lie of WMDs in Iraq? what has developed in this country is a pattern of deceit practiced upon a far too trusting population that frankly has its head in the sand. I'm sorry to be the bringer of bad news, but the more people who find out the truth the quicker we might be able to turn things around.

    remember also that building 7 is only one part of the questions surrounding 9/11.

    The following article raises some of the other issues of the hijackers dubious nature and the fact that there is no evidence tying the attacks to Osama Bin Laden, something Cheney even admitted in a TV interview. also mentioned is the impossibility of such flying maneuvers for anyone but the most highly skilled pilots:

    then you can google "able danger" to find out how the government was indeed tracking mohammed atta but failed to stop his alleged actions on 9/11

    so many things that don't add up.

    I suppose you probably also think JFK was just shot by a crazy nut named oswald even though FBI agents have come out and declared the warren commission story to be patently false.

    we are dealing with a progressively dark faction at work in this country. it's sad but true.

  3. one thing you are correct on though....the building is only 47 stories not 50. i'll correct that.

  4. this is also a good video you should definitely have a look at:

  5. the dutch expert is certain that it was controlled demolition after watching the video.

  6. and then my good sir you can have a look at this one if you like about the now admittedly fake telephone calls from the airplanes:

    or how about the lying around the christmas bomber story?

    it goes on and on my friend. so much so that anyone who has looked into these things possessing any intelligence comes up with the same dark conclusion. we are being lied to on a massive scale.

    some people are not all that happy about people finding out about this: