Showing posts with label 9/11 conspiracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 9/11 conspiracy. Show all posts
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Sunday, September 18, 2011
Obama Appoints Major Figure In 9/11 Cover Up To Intelligence Advisory Board
Obama appointed Phillip Zelikow, the Director of the absurdly flawed and discredited 9/11 Commission, to his Intelligence Advisory Board. Zelikow was also earlier involved in a terrorism study group in 1997/1998 which predicted the consequences of "an act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, [and] would be a watershed event in America’s history." Zelikov also drafted for the Bush administration the new national security strategy of 'preemptive attack."
President Obama also appointed Mona Sutphen, a close contact and colleague of Clinton's National Security Advisor Sandy R. Berger. Sutphen was managing director of Stonebridge International, "a global business strategy firm" formed by Mr. Berger. Mr. Berger was also convicted of the removal of crucial 9/11 documents from the National Archives at the time the 9/11 Comission was reviewing documents associated with 9/11.
On this linked webpage you can read one comment theorizing "zelikow and Sunstein's 'Obama propaganda ministry'[OPM] will be dealing with recent ripples in pool out of Florida, which, if opened by 'new investigation' [sen.Graham], would HAVE to deal with continued suppression of explosive information..."
Could it be that these insider appointments are a defensive move by the Obama administration to deal with, scuttle, or diffuse Senator Graham's recent call for a new 9/11 Investigation? At the very least they represent the continued correlation between the Obama administration and the insiders in previous administrations in the area of foreign policy.
_____
In addition: It is interesting to watch the following Council on Foreign Relations video where Zelikow recently spoke about 9/11 and the continuing War on Terror. Zelikow speaks assuredly and seemingly smartly about 9/11, yet to anyone who has looked at the facts surrounding 9/11 it seems as if the CFR and Zelikow are living in their own world of manipulated facts. Just to use one example: At 12:00 minutes in Zelikow talks of how it is not known if there was a support network for the terrorists inside the U.S. However we know that an FBI informant was helping the terrorists as well as influential Saudis. Zelikow also wishes to tie (14:00) Iran to actions aiding the terrorists in their travels by lax control over their visas and border controls. However we know that the U.S. itself could be accused of this, in their 'negligence' at the consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where the cross border travels of Al-Qaeda and the hijackers themselves were apparently purposely aided.
President Obama also appointed Mona Sutphen, a close contact and colleague of Clinton's National Security Advisor Sandy R. Berger. Sutphen was managing director of Stonebridge International, "a global business strategy firm" formed by Mr. Berger. Mr. Berger was also convicted of the removal of crucial 9/11 documents from the National Archives at the time the 9/11 Comission was reviewing documents associated with 9/11.
On this linked webpage you can read one comment theorizing "zelikow and Sunstein's 'Obama propaganda ministry'[OPM] will be dealing with recent ripples in pool out of Florida, which, if opened by 'new investigation' [sen.Graham], would HAVE to deal with continued suppression of explosive information..."
Could it be that these insider appointments are a defensive move by the Obama administration to deal with, scuttle, or diffuse Senator Graham's recent call for a new 9/11 Investigation? At the very least they represent the continued correlation between the Obama administration and the insiders in previous administrations in the area of foreign policy.
_____
In addition: It is interesting to watch the following Council on Foreign Relations video where Zelikow recently spoke about 9/11 and the continuing War on Terror. Zelikow speaks assuredly and seemingly smartly about 9/11, yet to anyone who has looked at the facts surrounding 9/11 it seems as if the CFR and Zelikow are living in their own world of manipulated facts. Just to use one example: At 12:00 minutes in Zelikow talks of how it is not known if there was a support network for the terrorists inside the U.S. However we know that an FBI informant was helping the terrorists as well as influential Saudis. Zelikow also wishes to tie (14:00) Iran to actions aiding the terrorists in their travels by lax control over their visas and border controls. However we know that the U.S. itself could be accused of this, in their 'negligence' at the consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where the cross border travels of Al-Qaeda and the hijackers themselves were apparently purposely aided.
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Trades Hall president Kevin Bracken calls 9/11 'conspiracy'
From The Daily Telegraph.
THE president of the Victorian Trades Hall has sparked outrage after controversially claiming the September 11 2001 World Trade Centre attacks were a conspiracy, not the result of terrorist activity.
Kevin Bracken, who is also the secretary of the Maritime Union of Australia, sparked a flood of angry calls after calling into ABC talk-back host Jon Faine's program this morning.
"I believe the official story is a conspiracy theory that doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny," Mr Bracken said.
"In my mind the buildings were imploded."
THE president of the Victorian Trades Hall has sparked outrage after controversially claiming the September 11 2001 World Trade Centre attacks were a conspiracy, not the result of terrorist activity.
Kevin Bracken, who is also the secretary of the Maritime Union of Australia, sparked a flood of angry calls after calling into ABC talk-back host Jon Faine's program this morning.
"I believe the official story is a conspiracy theory that doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny," Mr Bracken said.
"In my mind the buildings were imploded."
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Truth and Conspiracy in the Catskills
Having a look at some of the "anti-truth" comments after this mildly sympathetic article, it is disturbing to see actually how moronic, uninformed and lacking in vision or understanding your average contemporary New York Times reader must be. These are the people, some of them anyway, holding back this country in a twisted deceitful malaise of establishment disinfo and brainwashing. The rest are watching Fox news and cussing about liberals and the "Ground Zero" Mosque...together it's a team of left and right morons bent on securing a horrible future for this country.
From Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth and The New York Times
A small gathering of 50 or 60 people; roughly 95 percent white, 90 percent male, a few blond-haired kids, average age 45, all nodding in assent as a series of speakers explains that our government is conspiring against us and fabricating massive lies in order to hide its own crimes and frighten us into giving up our constitutional rights and liberties....
...At the end of the afternoon and before the conference-ending dinner, I slipped away. I thought about identifying myself before leaving. I should have, but I didn’t. Instead I drove home to a small dinner party: my wife and I, another couple and a friend. I told them about what I had seen and heard. The man of the couple said that on Sept. 11, 2001, when he heard the news, “inside job” was the first thought he had, although he hadn’t bothered much with the thought since. Our other guest told us that her brother-in-law was even more a partisan of the “government-did-it” view than those I had listened to. I guess you never know.
From Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth and The New York Times
A small gathering of 50 or 60 people; roughly 95 percent white, 90 percent male, a few blond-haired kids, average age 45, all nodding in assent as a series of speakers explains that our government is conspiring against us and fabricating massive lies in order to hide its own crimes and frighten us into giving up our constitutional rights and liberties....
...At the end of the afternoon and before the conference-ending dinner, I slipped away. I thought about identifying myself before leaving. I should have, but I didn’t. Instead I drove home to a small dinner party: my wife and I, another couple and a friend. I told them about what I had seen and heard. The man of the couple said that on Sept. 11, 2001, when he heard the news, “inside job” was the first thought he had, although he hadn’t bothered much with the thought since. Our other guest told us that her brother-in-law was even more a partisan of the “government-did-it” view than those I had listened to. I guess you never know.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
