Nafeez Mossadeq Ahmed on the Death of Osama Bin Laden

Maybe they did kill him, maybe they didn't. At this point, who knows? One thing is for sure, it is an event which is being used for manipulative purposes and the whole truth we certainly don't know yet. The real questions we should be asking are: Who is Bin Laden really? Who and what was his true support network? At one time it included ISI as well as CIA, so what does this new event really portray? How does this influence what we already know about the ISI (and thus CIA) involvement in 9/11? What purposes lie behind this "raid", or psychological operation? I like very much the manner in which these questions are discussed in the video below.

From 9/11 Blogger.




Just to think out loud here....some possible versions of what could be true:

1. Bin Laden died many years ago from his documented illnesses and the event is completely staged. (The wives stick out to me as an unexplained aspect with this theory however)
2. Bin Laden was killed, but at a time of choosing when it was profitable for the U.S. to do so. They knew his whereabouts before then. They may have even still had connections to him through ISI/CIA channels. He was a patsy.
3. It's all as Obama says. Go USA! (What he had with 9/11 to do, even the FBI can't explain however)

The third version I doubt very much. I invite anyone to suggest what might have happened....perhaps in time it will become clearer.

Why The Bin Laden Death Propaganda Might Be A Very Bad Omen

From What Really Happened.


IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THIS IS THE OPENING GAMBIT IN A PLAN TO STAGE A "REVENGE" ATTACK FROM "AL QAEDA" ON THE UNITED STATES, WITH WHICH TO JUSTIFY TOTAL WAR ON THE MIDDLE EAST.

With Incredible Gall FBI Admits Osama Bin Laden Photo Made to Look Like War Critic Spanish MP

The FBI brazenly modeled their new Osama Bin Laden photo on Gaspar Llamazares, a member of Spain's Communist party and a critic of the US "war on terror" admitted FBI spokesman Ken Hoffman.

First just appreciate how significant that actually is. The FBI used a photo of a politician from the Spanish parliament critical of their 'war on terror' to create a mock up image of Osama Bin Laden. Does that sound like the actions of a credible organization?

Obviously if you have a crystal ball and a population trained to seek war against whatever image you put in that crystal ball, then why not? Why not put the image of someone from the political opposition in there as an insulting jab, or perhaps to even subconsciously blur the lines between politcal opposition and terrorists?

Soon we will have many images of villians to be despised as, just like in the fictional movie Running Man, an enormous TV screen will be built in Times Square to show the dumb downed masses an image of their supposed enemies.

In Orwell's famous novel 1984, the population is persuaded to hate whichever group (first Eastasia, then Eurasia) the ruling elite wish to wage war on (the war is also perpetual, keeping the population controlled in a constant state of fear) and additionally the image of Emmanuel Goldstein, defender of individual liberty, is used as the symbol to which "Two Minutes Hate" is directed as his image is displayed every day on the "Telescreens."

The FBI have introduced one scheme yet better. Change the face of the villain, thus enabling the villain's face to suit the needs or fancies of those who control it.

For those new to the truth, you might also wish to look at an analysis of reports here of Osama Bin Laden meeting with the CIA prior to 9/11 and also here to the testimony of an FBI whistleblower that branches of our government had an "intimate" relationship with Al Qaida right up until 9/11.

If you prefer satire, here is a clip showing what Bin Laden's Hollywood production team might resemble...